CelticGent
Aug 5 2005, 10:13 AM
2 live crew - hoochie mama
AndrewT
Aug 5 2005, 10:28 AM
Koenji Hyakkei - Molavena
TrainerAZ
Aug 5 2005, 10:52 AM
Usual mass-market crap on the radio. They won't let us use internet radio at work anymore, too much bandwidth.
AndrewT
Aug 5 2005, 11:08 AM
That's what mp3 CDs are for.
TheGreenOne
Aug 5 2005, 11:22 AM
Or lossless compressed CDs so you don't screw up the sound quality.
Rimbaud
Aug 5 2005, 11:23 AM
"Kodachrome" - Paul Simon
CelticGent
Aug 5 2005, 11:56 AM
cunt sucking cannibal - gg allin
AndrewT
Aug 5 2005, 11:56 AM
QUOTE(TheGreenOne @ Aug 5 2005, 02:22 PM)
Or lossless compressed CDs so you don't screw up the sound quality.
Just rip your mp3s at 160 k/s or higher. I honestly can't tell any difference between that and CD quality.
Rimbaud
Aug 5 2005, 01:13 PM
"Masked Ball" - Jocelyn Pook
TheGreenOne
Aug 5 2005, 01:15 PM
It depends on what equipment (player, amp, speakers/headphones) you're using. On a ipod-type set-up, you're right, it won't make a difference. If you're using a good portable amp (such as a Total AirHead or comparable) and some quality earphones, you can really tell the difference .
TrainerAZ
Aug 5 2005, 02:55 PM
I'm the only Total AirHead in my office.
There are a few others on the floor, tho.
Le Gimp
Aug 12 2005, 05:14 AM
QUOTE(AndrewT @ Aug 5 2005, 02:56 PM)
QUOTE(TheGreenOne @ Aug 5 2005, 02:22 PM)
Or lossless compressed CDs so you don't screw up the sound quality.
Just rip your mp3s at 160 ks/s or higher. I honestly can't tell any difference between that and CD quality.
Actually sampling at 160k/s when the original is 44ks/s and using a lossy algorithem like MP3 will still give you lossy compression. There will be aliassing problems with the differnt sample rates as well. This will generate artifacts above the original frequency sampled at 44khz.
Not that I can hear it since my hearing rolls off a 4KC.
Rimbaud
Aug 12 2005, 06:02 AM
I use 128kbps on my iPod and it sounds just fine.
CelticGent
Aug 12 2005, 06:12 AM
i dropped my drawers & said "welcum back, kotter"
TheGreenOne
Aug 12 2005, 07:35 AM
Bet no one else did.
AndrewT
Aug 12 2005, 11:08 AM
QUOTE(Le Gimp @ Aug 12 2005, 08:14 AM)
Actually sampling at 160k/s when the original is 44ks/s and using a lossy algorithem like MP3 will still give you lossy compression. There will be aliassing problems with the differnt sample rates as well. This will generate artifacts above the original frequency sampled at 44khz.
Not that I can hear it since my hearing rolls off a 4KC.
I'm talking 160 k/s, not 160 khz. It refers to the ammount of compression used, not the frequency of the data.. 128 k/s is the standard for MP3s, which leaves them sounding a bit flat. With 160 or 192 k/s, the files are slightly bigger, but the sound quality is much better.
Of course they're still lossy, but I really don't mind. Unless you're doing some pretty intense audio editing, the wave form doesn't need to be perfect. Whatever you're listening to is still inferior to hearing it in person anyways. It's kind of like complaining about lossy DVD compression when you're watching something like South Park.
Raindog
Aug 13 2005, 03:00 PM
Mitch Hedberg
A.B. Normal
Aug 14 2005, 07:17 PM
I saw him at the Improv shortly before he died.
It was sad.
He was really fucked up and it was painfully obvious.
I wish I hadn't seen that show.
Louched Liver
Aug 14 2005, 11:11 PM
How about this one? Just as dead.
A.B. Normal
Aug 15 2005, 06:52 AM
Aw shit.
This is Tune Talk?
Damn.
Larspeart
Aug 15 2005, 07:16 AM
Tom Waits.
Raindog
Aug 20 2005, 04:04 PM
Wilco/ Casino Queen
Larspeart
Aug 20 2005, 04:59 PM
"All The Way"- Frank Sinatra.
greeneyes
Aug 20 2005, 09:02 PM
The Allentown weather report.
Raindog
Aug 20 2005, 09:20 PM
QUOTE(That guy who says lots of stupid shit, then says-"Bro" after to make it ok.peart @ Aug 15 2005, 10:16 AM)
Please die, Pat Robertson is counting on you.
Louched Liver
Aug 20 2005, 09:21 PM
Weird, possibly druggie music references. Lack of beer content. Thread closed.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.