By the MPAA.

It contains neither controversy nor explicit content. MPAA seems to be more noromic™ than FDA. Sort them out, finally!

Someone hasn't been listening to the administration newspeak agency...we all "know" that hoods on prisoners isn't torture, merely...eeerrrr...vigorous interrogation protocol attire.

Maybe the makers should sue the MPAA and call Alberto R. Gonzalez as a witness, so he can "explain" it isn't a depiction of torture.

For many of us just having these fux in Washington instead of occupying a small cell at the Hague is constant torture.

Bunch of pansy-assed liberals. You've all forgotten what real torture is like.

Click on "Opaline" in the music player

It is ode to La Fee Parisian, with beautifully wrongly-spelled "Baudelaire", "Pere-Lachaise" and "Fee". Btw, I have just read, ya will have La Fee in the States quite soon. Let sum it up:

LuXit™

Kouzobler

St. George Vegetable Soup (St. George should feel offended, St. Jerome has to ask him)

La Pee Fartisian

Ya are lucky! Congrats!

The beet goes on.

So do the flamers, cocktail mixing fags, and bad-assed xooter drinkers....

Wait fer the fifth offering...

I think it's time we banned the MPAA.

How fucked up is it that films glorifying torture like Saw get the MPAA's rubber stamp but a film criticizing actual torture gets its poster banned? Legally I do believe the MPAA has just transgressed the film-makers' constitutional rights.

Meanwhile, they're giving a "G" rating to a documentary about water-boarding because the producer told them it was the hot new extreme sport.