Nepenthes: We will be getting together again real soon. I will give a little more of a heads up next time!

I thought the Pernod 68 tasted sort of funny, but they assured me that it just came that way.

..yeah sweet, anise... and nothing else. BLEH!

Yes, I was also very let down by the P68.

It is my second least favorite absinthe. I liked Mari Mayans better.

Not much, though.

I thought the P68 tasted almost exactly like the regular, pastis version. Way too sweet.....Nepenthes! I can't wait to meet you. Hopefully we will have another get together real soon!!

Pernod 68 if fucking gross.

Yef, I agree it'f fucking groff.

Finally got one!
Quote of post of above.
24 hour post ban for the Peng.

You're a cruel man, Mr. Mayor. I like that.

I've been itching to use the Admin Time
Out feature.
He's banned from posting for a day, starting
2 minutes ago.

So...

The iron hand in the iron glove ...

DG

Ouch, Pengwaffle.

We await your return.

Louchie, need a Midol for your PMS(1)?


















(1) Penguin Must Suffer

Good thing he wasn't chewing gum in line.

yeah, but he DID bring a copy of the latest Belgian SI swimsuit edition to school.

although he was unpleasantly surprised to find out that it wasn't anywhere near as erotic as the girl robot issue of Popular Mechanics.

Again-
Fucks gotta listen up.
Shit was posted in the FAQ for ages.
Got off w/ 1/7th the posted penalty, so
I must have shown great leniencey, huh?

Or you forgot what the penalty was.

gee, what a punishment....not having to listen to us fucks blab.

Kinda like being sent to your room.

DG

inside an insane asylum.

Oh, he can still read, just can't regale us
w/his waffley wit.

And yeah, I forgot the penno.

I miss Six.

I've missed him with every shot so far.

I was going to set up a trap for him ... a dictionary under a box held up a stick with a string attached.

Let Spuckky post one, and when the waffle goes for it .... WHAM!

DG

Do it!

Too much!

Leniency.

No, I don't think so. they were both quotes from the posts immediately above, but I thought they would only elicit responses unless I made it clear what part I was responding to -- in one instance, there was just the matter of a single "f".

But of course, feel free to try ot armtwist everyone in following the letter of the FAQ -- after all, it's your forum.

I'm entirely unrepentant, though, and this time you'll have to edit these posts if they're still an eyesore to you, while usually a gentle PM nudge will make me mend my ways when I mistakenly quote something I shouldn't have.

Feel free to organise a poll, though, on the subject of whether I should edit the posts. I will bow to the voice of an overwhelming majority ;).

Damn! I didn't pull the string fast enough!

DG

No you didn't.

In proteft, I'll uve another poft to point out that, had I not quoted the poft above mine to do a highlight of the fnippet of intereft, everybody would have wondered what the heck that poft waf all about (though I muft admit fome of you may ftill be puvvled).

Fo you'll all have to fuffer another take at the fame lame joke, and I'll make fure I ufe enough "f" letterf thif time around fo af to make it ekftremely painful for the eyef.

Fo there .

innproteft, ,I'll uve 'nuther poft toopoimtootthar ,hasMe nots quoted thu poft above mind toodohthu highlight off thu fnippet off intereft, ,everybody wud haf wondered whar thu heck thar poft waf al abootin (though Me muft admit fome off your ams gonna ftill bpuvvled).

Fo you'll al haf toofuffer 'nuther taked attthu fame lame joke, ,an I'll maked fure Me ufe enough "f" letterf thif timaround fo af toomaked i tekftremely painful Forethu eyef.

Fo Thier Thier

[Relevant quote within quote elided. Yes, it'd make more sense to read it here, but you'll all have to go back a few posts to read it. So there.]

I see.

Pot, kettle, black, and I'm assuming your LL shield is armed and fully operational -- you're still posting, even though you've just quoted the post just above yours.

And not just one line -- all of it, including the "DG" signature and the empty line that precedes it.

Of course, we're all animals equally subject to the FAQ rules, only you're more equal than I am.

Exactly.

Well, the thing is, my post are worth quoting.

I'm just saying.

DG

You are aware of the fact that line of reasoning would tend to imply Jack's posts aren't worth quoting, are you?

Of course, you're one of the few persons who can credibly claim that you're incapable of a line of reasoning that long, just to avoid the wrath of the .

My posts really aren't worth quoting. Carry on!

May I quote you on that, or shouldn't I (as it's not worth quoting)?

Quite a dilemma...at least once someone inserts another post. Right now, of course, it's not "de rigueur".

I saw that Pengo!

DG

...

Now I know why penguins waddle. Brass ones. Six, you are relentless.

...

...

Damn, Mayor. You really got that penguin's feathers ruffled.

I don't'[t think I've ever seen an attack penguin.

DG

Here ya go: